California Contractors Avoid This Costly Problem With Your License


In the recent CA appellate decision, Pacific Caisson & Shoring, Inc., v. Bernards Bros. Inc. #B248320, the justices ruled against Pacific’s claim for compensation from Bernards.

The reasoning was that Pacific’s license was suspended for 77 days during the time Pacific was doing the work, which lasted 18 months. Pacific claimed the suspension was unfair, because the suspension occurred when the RMO for Pacific had another license he was RMO for suspended for failure to pay benefits to a union trust.

The justices decided that Pacific had not acted reasonably and in good faith to maintain proper licensure, because its RMO had not taken proper care of the responsibilities regarding the other license.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: